39 Comments for this article

Tags: , , , , ,

WILMINGTON, NC (WWAY) — They say politics makes strange bedfellows. A candidate for Wilmington City Council is finding that out the hard way after we’ve uncovered a campaign record that says if he died, he wanted to give his campaign money to a controversial county commissioner.

Among the many documents candidates have to fill out is the Candidate Designation of Committee Funds, which says where any leftover campaign money would go if they die. Some council candidates want their funds to go to non-profits or political parties. One candidate, though, originally designated his funds to New Hanover County Commissioner Brian Berger’s campaign.

Joshua Fulton is the youngest candidate for Wilmington City Council. He’s a fiscally-conservative graduate student at UNCW who says he re-designated his funds after Berger became the center of numerous controversies.

Fulton refused to talk on camera, but in a statement to WWAY said: “In February, I designated Brian Berger’s campaign as the beneficiary of any campaign funds I might have in the event of my death. At that time, like the more than 30,000 people who voted for him, I thought Brian was going to be a voice for limited government and fiscal responsibility. As a result of his personal and political actions, I thought it was best to disassociate myself with him. I wish Brian well and hope he can be a voice for fiscally responsible, limited government on the county commission.”

Fulton made Berger’s campaign his beneficiary in February. Between February and July, when Fulton changed the designation, Berger was arrested, was involved in a car accident with questions about his insurance, got into arguments with fellow commissioners and was late or did not show up to several meetings. It was also discovered that Berger, who claimed to own his own consulting business, was collecting unemployment.

After all of the public drama, Fulton said Berger was not who he thought he was. His funds would now go to the United Way.

Fellow council candidate Margaret Haynes also chose a charity: the Domestic Violence Shelter and Services.

Ronald Sparks wants his money split between Ephesus Junior Academy and the Red Cross.

Laura Padgett’s cash would go to the Making Waves Foundation of the Cape Fear Public Transportation Authority.

Two candidates, Frank Meares and Neil Anderson, decided to give money back to contributors.

Napier Fuller would give his funds to the New Hanover County Republican Party.

Candidates Ricky Meeks and Matthew Hinson have not filed a Candidate Designation of Committee Funds form, because their campaign coffers are below the $1,000 threshold.

Comment on this Story

Leave a Reply

39 Comments on "ONLY ON 3: Council candidate Fulton originally leaves election money to Brian Berger"

Notify of

Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
Guest
wilmastute
2016 years 2 months ago

The comment above is so right– a website designed to smear a young man–has all the smell of the old guard crowd.We have seen this garbage before and we will again. Why? McColl, Saffo and a tight group of old line dems and reps want to keep control of wilmington for themselves, developers and –and their buddies. This from the same crowd that gave you lavish spending on the Gravely, higher sales and property taxes, and wants to build a “golden” bridge and use our money to fund arts councils and ball teams –we should reject the smears. What they… Read more »

Guest
truthseeker
2016 years 2 months ago

When it comes to “real” what we don’t need are these three misfits–just more of the same miserable crowd that has done things to help entrenched interests and themselves– say no to these three and say no to annexation, spending and more of the same nonsense that Wilmington shouldn’t tolerate.There good at spending our money- we can do better with Fulton!

Guest
Guestwit
2016 years 2 months ago

It is a sad commentary that the old guard in wilmington is on another smear and destroy campaign. They are very desparate so they create site full of untruths- rather than have voters focus on the pathetic records of Padgett and Fuller(a real lightweight realtor)-let alone Sparks and his questionable conduct. Old guard folks like McColl would like more of same– avoid transparency, tax and spend–let’s fund an arts council and ball team with public money. WE KNOW BETTER- reject the smears–Vote for Josh.Say NO to Louise McColl, King Saffo and the rest of the old guard who will do… Read more »

Guest
Guest2012
2016 years 2 months ago

Running for Political Office in the Bible belt.
I would die laughing if we didn’t elect a Socialist to the Presidency in 2008.
I know we are not going to go to the polls without VETTING the candidates to the nth degree in both our local and national elections ffrom now on.

Everyone should check out the site above.

Guest
2016 years 2 months ago

So what! Do we know what department he was auditing, since insurance companies have auditors in most of their departments. Painting with a rather large brush, wouldn’t you say? I’ve only listened to Josh on the radio, looked at his website, and have no idea if I’d vote for him or not…at this point.

But the website specifically built to smear Josh gives me reason to believe Saffo, Louise McColl and her thugs are behind it.

Related News