A former Boiling Spring Lakes police officer is going to prison for raping a 14-year-old in his patrol car.
Thirty-eight year old Luke Stidham pleaded guilty to one count of second-degree rape and two counts of indecent liberties with a fourteen year old.
The incident happened in July and August 2006, after Stidham courted the young lady on MySpace.
Stidham is married and has three children of his own. He will serve 4 and a half years behind bars as part of the plea bargain.


Mr. Stidham NEVER admitted
Mr. Stidham NEVER admitted to this crime, It was a ALFORD plea.The alford plea is a pleading of guilty in a plea bargain in which the defendant maintains his or her innocence, and the only reason he pleaded was when he tried getting the evidence he needed to prove he did not do this it was denied to him, something you would have thought his so called attorney would have retrieved in the first place. I take that back, his attorney did have the information and more but he did not do his job, instead he kept it hidden. It's a bad thing when your own retained attorney seems to be doing more for the prosecutor then his own client.
Luke Stidham
This is to everyone who made ill comments here against Mr Stidham.
****Stay Tuned*** Because this is not the ending to this story. I believe everyone will be shocked to fnd out what "really" happed and how certain evidence was never presented but hidden even from Mr Stidham.Better beware, this could happen to you. After all, once you have been accused you are in the eyes of the public guilty....
BSL Citizens, Do You Really Want To Know?
I'm afraid
brunswick county IS a joke
BSL Is Worse Than The County!
Brunswick County is a joke
No...no joke...so bye!!!!
Guilty or railroaded?
"Guilty your honor"
"Luke had a chance to stand
"Luke had a chance to stand trial. He CHOSE to plead guilty to avoid all the evidence against being made public. He KNOWS what he did and knows it was wrong. His first attorney told him to plea and he fired him. He tried it again with this attorney and wanted ANOTHER continuance. Denied. Face the facts. Innocent people don't plead to crimes they didn't do. He is guilty as sin"
Are kidding? Evidence, what evidence? Oh, you must mean the results of te DNA for Semen that came back NEGATIVE.Wait a minute, did you mean all the witnesses interviewed by the state? Couldn't be that, everyone of those would have been in favor of Mr Stidham.I bet you were talking about the Forensic Exam of Mr Stidhams computer. the one the state said in open court "Was never ordered" I'm sorry, twice the state said that in open court. It couldn't be that because according to a fax from the state to the defence attorney they would be getting the results from that exam the next day, and this was a month BEFORE trial.I bet you were talking about all the statements made that this girl had a history of accusing others of the same if they ticked her off. Nope, I bet the evidence that yr alking about is when she tried taking her life..by taking 8 freaking Tylonals. Yeah, yr right, I can't see anyone wanting all that evidence open to the public, the thing is the ony one I would think wouldn't want this public would be the state. Get access to pacer.gov and find out for yr self..
Except for your Chief
GUILTY! GUILTY! GUILTY!
Learn more before u judge.
Learn more before u judge. Mr Stidham had a attorney for the entire 2 years, a attorney who had enough evidence to prove Mr Stidham did not comit this crime but for some reason he didn't use it. Every piece of so called evidence that the state had showed to be in favor of Mr Stidham. Get access to pacer.gov and get a clue!!!!
You people ever heard of
Dear friend of a pedophile
You need to get a life its
What is going on in this world!
I am a cop myself and this
Keep at it!
Thank you!!!! You are right!
Who knows what was going
bsl
Those who live in glass houses....
Glass houses?
The victims’ morals have
morals
As you said she could have
"If she had been willing he
"If she had been willing he would not have been charged with 2nd degree rape" Have you read the transcript on ths case? The state said, she was depressed because he cut off all ties and she thought he got what he wanted out of the relationship" First of all I do not believe there was a sexual event at all but if there were how can you say it was against her will one minute and the next yr saying there was a relationship? The state lied in open court and I have seen the documents proving this.
This guy is a petifile and undeserving of this plea bargain!