make WWAY your homepage  Become a fan on facebook  Follow us on twitter  Receive RSS Newsfeeds  MEMBERS: Register | Login

How is that?

The charges are second-degree murder under the intent of malice. How can you spin it that this man who was driving slowly away from police officers, using his turn signals, was responsible for the death of this officer? Especially with malice. Let us check the facts: The fleeing vehicle was not speeding. Said vehicle was not firing at officers or trying to run them off of the road. No need for excessive speed to assist. Officer Matthews was driving at 100 MPH when he wrecked. Officer Matthews obviously could not handle a vehicle at these speeds. I don't see any malice involved. I am pretty sure if Mr. Pierce had wanted to maliciously harm a police officer, he could have used the alleged firearm he carried. I only see a man who should be on trial for 3 things: Marijuana, eluding police, and firearms.


The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.
Please re-enter the code shown in the image below.