make WWAY your homepage  Become a fan on facebook  Follow us on twitter  Receive RSS Newsfeeds  MEMBERS: Register | Login

I don't get it.

I suppose this is the same judge that would return abused children to their parents after they've been loved and nursed back to health by someone else. True, I don't know these people. They could have had all the best intentions, then just got in over their heads. They just need to consider what's best for them AND the animals. Abuse doesn't necessarily mean you don't love the animal, but you just don't know how to show it. Whatever their intentions, I would like to know how the vet/judge can justify returning these poor animals to the same people who starved them or whatever it is they are saying they didn't do (deworming???? Sure...)This is one vet I will NEVER use.

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.