Submitted by Guestwho (not verified) on Tue, 06/23/2009 - 10:22am.
I suppose this is the same judge that would return abused children to their parents after they've been loved and nursed back to health by someone else. True, I don't know these people. They could have had all the best intentions, then just got in over their heads. They just need to consider what's best for them AND the animals. Abuse doesn't necessarily mean you don't love the animal, but you just don't know how to show it. Whatever their intentions, I would like to know how the vet/judge can justify returning these poor animals to the same people who starved them or whatever it is they are saying they didn't do (deworming???? Sure...)This is one vet I will NEVER use.
I don't get it.