make WWAY your homepage  Become a fan on facebook  Follow us on twitter  Receive RSS Newsfeeds  MEMBERS: Register | Login

Get tougher. MUCH tougher.

If a channel shows ads to support themselves, then I don't see why they should even be expecting a cable or satellite carrier to pay to carry them in the first place. Except for locals, without the carrier, these channels have no audience and no revenue AT ALL! If they can't support themselves with the ads, then they should fold instead of expecting us to pay AND watch ads. As it is, we have very limited say in what channels we subscribe to, so in the end we are paying for channels we don't want. There's fifty-seven channels and nothin' on? Please... we now have 2,495 channels that cost and arm and a leg and still there's nothin' on. With regard to local channels, virtually everyone "should" be able to get those free over the air with the right antenna anyway. I can get all but a couple locals with a simple indoor antenna, and can get the rest with an external one, so why would I want to pay a carrier to re-broadcast it?


The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.
Please re-enter the code shown in the image below.