Your article neglected to mention that Frog Strickland was arrested for setting fire to his own house. You have implied that RC Soles was somehow invovled in the arson. This is not the case. As for the "unnamed source" who claims Soles molested him when he was thirteen, does the "source" also belong to the criminal fringe inhabited by the other young men who, in drug-induced states of confusion, have badgered Soles over the years for money? It looks to me like rational people will be unable to put much credence into the tales of Soles' so-called victims. The victims' invovlement in illicit drugs and outlandish criminal activities seriously diminishes their credibility.