Submitted by Disturbed (not verified) on Mon, 02/08/2010 - 10:35am.
First of all its "hypocrisy" and "apparent," but you should take a second and look at your argument. The only part of what you said that is any way an argument is : there are many reasons that gays should not be allowed to serve. Instead of actually supporting this with evidence you turned it around on those who believe in complete acceptance, and attacked those people. Make a valid point and maybe those of us who believe in Universal Human Rights will listen to you.
First of all its "hypocrisy"
First of all its "hypocrisy" and "apparent," but you should take a second and look at your argument. The only part of what you said that is any way an argument is : there are many reasons that gays should not be allowed to serve. Instead of actually supporting this with evidence you turned it around on those who believe in complete acceptance, and attacked those people. Make a valid point and maybe those of us who believe in Universal Human Rights will listen to you.