They charged him with 59 counts of animal cruelty, but they don't know where the dogs are. That is a little fishy, because the dogs are the evidence how can you charge someone without evidence. Are they just taking the animal rights fanatics word for it. I hope not because they will lie and do whatever it takes for a conviction. How did they present this to the DA without the dogs. Know they can generate what ever pictures they please. This whole thing seems like a fabrication.