Submitted by Guest4now (not verified) on Wed, 04/28/2010 - 9:34pm.
So now Mr. Williams knows exactly what happened, because he was there at the scene? The truth is that Pierce was NOT "already in custody" when Ofc. Matthews was responding. Thats what the defense wants you to think. Pierce was still eluding the police and dumping his stash of illegal narcotics. Maybe thats the "raw deal" he is referring to? That Pierce lost $30,000 worth of drugs and not that an officer lost his life???
So now Mr. Williams knows
So now Mr. Williams knows exactly what happened, because he was there at the scene? The truth is that Pierce was NOT "already in custody" when Ofc. Matthews was responding. Thats what the defense wants you to think. Pierce was still eluding the police and dumping his stash of illegal narcotics. Maybe thats the "raw deal" he is referring to? That Pierce lost $30,000 worth of drugs and not that an officer lost his life???