Submitted by ncbenz (not verified) on Wed, 05/19/2010 - 4:00pm.
A good point - Democrats should not have to accept Mr. Breazeale either.
Democrats who want a change to the way business is being conducted in Washington should support Mr. Pantano.
Here's all that needs to be said about Mr. Breazeale to guage his character: Around 1030 yesterday he stated on live video feed that Mr. Pantano had a GENERAL discharge and that it was less than HONORABLE because his service was less than honorable.
He stated this as a fact - and Mr. Breazealed straigt-up lied.
The reporter asked what proof Mr. Breazeale had to which Mr. Breazeale responded that he had none.
At around 1130 - Mr. Pantano handed copies of his HONORABLE Discharge to members of the press.
For a guy who was running on his Reserve Lieutenant Colonel comission in the Army it is ghastly that he would disparage a fellow veteran's service with NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER.
Character counts and Mr. Breazeale's is lacking in several areas.
Agreed
A good point - Democrats should not have to accept Mr. Breazeale either.
Democrats who want a change to the way business is being conducted in Washington should support Mr. Pantano.
Here's all that needs to be said about Mr. Breazeale to guage his character: Around 1030 yesterday he stated on live video feed that Mr. Pantano had a GENERAL discharge and that it was less than HONORABLE because his service was less than honorable.
He stated this as a fact - and Mr. Breazealed straigt-up lied.
The reporter asked what proof Mr. Breazeale had to which Mr. Breazeale responded that he had none.
At around 1130 - Mr. Pantano handed copies of his HONORABLE Discharge to members of the press.
For a guy who was running on his Reserve Lieutenant Colonel comission in the Army it is ghastly that he would disparage a fellow veteran's service with NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER.
Character counts and Mr. Breazeale's is lacking in several areas.
'nuf said