Submitted by S. Johnson (not verified) on Tue, 05/25/2010 - 7:23pm.
Of course we parents want to know the rationale for suspending Mr. Coleman, however when you work day in and day out over 2 years with a person and only see positive actions, you must stand by what you see. Because in these United States a man/woman is presumed INNOCENT until EVIDENCE proves otherwise. Not the other way around. Mr. Coleman has had 2 evaluations by his superiors and never received any reprimands. If there was any DIRT to be discovered, they would have let it slip to protect their reputations. As it is they are left scrambling trying to backfill or retroactively create allegations. To date I have heard nothing to negate the high esteem we hold him in.
Suspension
Of course we parents want to know the rationale for suspending Mr. Coleman, however when you work day in and day out over 2 years with a person and only see positive actions, you must stand by what you see. Because in these United States a man/woman is presumed INNOCENT until EVIDENCE proves otherwise. Not the other way around. Mr. Coleman has had 2 evaluations by his superiors and never received any reprimands. If there was any DIRT to be discovered, they would have let it slip to protect their reputations. As it is they are left scrambling trying to backfill or retroactively create allegations. To date I have heard nothing to negate the high esteem we hold him in.