Submitted by Sand_N-Sea4Me (not verified) on Wed, 06/09/2010 - 1:13pm.
Oh geez, grow up. State your case without resorting to name calling. Makes me realize the apple doesn't fall far from tree in some cases. It was not Underwood who made the call. If you go to bcswan.net and look up the minutes from the meeting (they are public) you will see that what Underwood presented to the board is exactly what parents were polled on and it included jeans. The no jeans rule is the board's vote, not LMS. I don't agree with no jeans any more than you do, but get your facts straight. Did you see the letter that was sent home with students on Monday? It says that LMS is in talks with the school board to modify the decision so there may be hope yet.
Not Underwood
Oh geez, grow up. State your case without resorting to name calling. Makes me realize the apple doesn't fall far from tree in some cases. It was not Underwood who made the call. If you go to bcswan.net and look up the minutes from the meeting (they are public) you will see that what Underwood presented to the board is exactly what parents were polled on and it included jeans. The no jeans rule is the board's vote, not LMS. I don't agree with no jeans any more than you do, but get your facts straight. Did you see the letter that was sent home with students on Monday? It says that LMS is in talks with the school board to modify the decision so there may be hope yet.