Submitted by Guest99x (not verified) on Mon, 07/05/2010 - 9:01pm.
Please re-read the article again... one of the proof Ms. Holden had to satisfy was that the defendant was driving while revoked. She provided the paperwork from DMV in Raleigh to attest to this yet she didn't satisfy the "court" (the judge, really).
Vincent Bugliosi couldn't have prosecuted this case any better...
Maybe some of the collected rancor should be reserved for the judge who disregarded the evidence of this fine citizen with a 25 page police record's licence revocation.
I think that the wrong person is getting pelted with rotten fruit in the pillory this time around...
Please re-read the article
Please re-read the article again... one of the proof Ms. Holden had to satisfy was that the defendant was driving while revoked. She provided the paperwork from DMV in Raleigh to attest to this yet she didn't satisfy the "court" (the judge, really).
Vincent Bugliosi couldn't have prosecuted this case any better...
Maybe some of the collected rancor should be reserved for the judge who disregarded the evidence of this fine citizen with a 25 page police record's licence revocation.
I think that the wrong person is getting pelted with rotten fruit in the pillory this time around...