make WWAY your homepage  Become a fan on facebook  Follow us on twitter  Receive RSS Newsfeeds  MEMBERS: Register | Login

Answer for You

To 'Citizen With Questions', the case could have continued to trial if they had used what is called a Bill of Information, which is like a new warrant or indictment and would have corrected whatever wording was wrong, but would not have had to go through the Grand Jury process. Bills of Information are used in superior courts all the time to allow defendants to plead to charges that are slightly different than what they were originally charged with, so it's a common practice. However, a Defendant must agree before a Bill of Information can be used, and apparently this Defendant chose to exercise his right to have his charges go to a Grand Jury instead of just correcting the wording and going ahead with the trial by using the Bill of Information. The article didn't specifically mention that this is what happened in court, but I don't know of any other way, legally speaking, that the case could have gone forward this week other than by using the Bill of Information.

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.
CAPTCHA
Please re-enter the code shown in the image below.