Submitted by Guest12 (not verified) on Wed, 07/28/2010 - 2:32pm.
This is just a minor glich. As mentioned in the article the case could have continued, but the suspect refused. So he is the one people should be mad at. The DA's office didn't do anything wrong. As mentioned in the article "the evidence always suggested there were nine counts, but it's rare that anyone is sentenced to more than three terms at a time. Filing only three counts, she says, helped speed up the process." Ok, so he would rather be convicted of 9 counts rather than 3? Again, not the DA's fault, but the offender's stupidity! As previously mentioned, Mr Britt is currently a registered sex offender and has been charged with MORE sex offenses so I would think that people would be glad he is in jail. He obviously didn't learn his lesson the first time. I also agree with another post. Why is WWAY focusing so hard on Brunswick County Courts? I challenge them to dig into other county's court systems and see what they find. Sounds like a personal vendetta to me.
This is just a minor glich.
This is just a minor glich. As mentioned in the article the case could have continued, but the suspect refused. So he is the one people should be mad at. The DA's office didn't do anything wrong. As mentioned in the article "the evidence always suggested there were nine counts, but it's rare that anyone is sentenced to more than three terms at a time. Filing only three counts, she says, helped speed up the process." Ok, so he would rather be convicted of 9 counts rather than 3? Again, not the DA's fault, but the offender's stupidity! As previously mentioned, Mr Britt is currently a registered sex offender and has been charged with MORE sex offenses so I would think that people would be glad he is in jail. He obviously didn't learn his lesson the first time. I also agree with another post. Why is WWAY focusing so hard on Brunswick County Courts? I challenge them to dig into other county's court systems and see what they find. Sounds like a personal vendetta to me.