the acquarium is state owned. Adjacent to it is a very large state owned visitor center. One might think there would be some cost savings in putting the pier there.
But I'm certain someone will have a whippy response to explain the cost savings & effective management knowing the site proposed is 7 miles from the acquarium.
And of course no one questions the current ownership of the proposed site or the cost of the property.
It's great knowing there are so many witty posters who have anticipated all of the issues.
More information about formatting options