Submitted by Jimmy (not verified) on Wed, 10/27/2010 - 6:28pm.
A constitutional amendment should not be necessary. During the election process any felony would most likely become public. Adding the amendment I believe would only open another loop hole for political games. For example, what if a corrupt sheriff is in office and frames any opponent that may run against him for a felony making that person ineligible to run for office?
Against
A constitutional amendment should not be necessary. During the election process any felony would most likely become public. Adding the amendment I believe would only open another loop hole for political games. For example, what if a corrupt sheriff is in office and frames any opponent that may run against him for a felony making that person ineligible to run for office?