Submitted by Andrew Rhodes on Wed, 09/22/2010 - 5:47pm.
A better, more intelligent system would draw in more riders, therefore more income, therefore no need to raise fares (a raise in CURRENT fares as opposed to a higher fare rate for the suggested Express bus to the airport and others).
The new building projects, especially with the excessive luxury portions of the budget, should never have been made. Of course, based on the aforementioned suggestion of where the central point should be, either an existing building or a new, but basic (decent, clean, etc, but not luxury filled) office where all passengers have access to (for certain business matters relating to customer service) wouldn't be out of the question.
As to my "anti-aristocrat" attitude, if you can't take it, don't dish it. You folks had your say about the quality of the ridership. I had my say about you folks. It's not like I threw a temper tantrum and ran to the mods. I can take it, how about you?
Better system, same fares
A better, more intelligent system would draw in more riders, therefore more income, therefore no need to raise fares (a raise in CURRENT fares as opposed to a higher fare rate for the suggested Express bus to the airport and others).
The new building projects, especially with the excessive luxury portions of the budget, should never have been made. Of course, based on the aforementioned suggestion of where the central point should be, either an existing building or a new, but basic (decent, clean, etc, but not luxury filled) office where all passengers have access to (for certain business matters relating to customer service) wouldn't be out of the question.
As to my "anti-aristocrat" attitude, if you can't take it, don't dish it. You folks had your say about the quality of the ridership. I had my say about you folks. It's not like I threw a temper tantrum and ran to the mods. I can take it, how about you?