Submitted by Educated voter (not verified) on Fri, 10/15/2010 - 11:39pm.
Not implying a conspiracy, but a women known to have consistently referred to the Tea Party as "Crazy People" and republican observers as "morons" saying she operates on a non-partisan basis is a little hard to swallow. We all know the board of election workers are encouraged to change there affiliation to "unaffiliated" but the truth is the Board of Elections is partisan by its very definition. Correct me if I am wrong but is there not a state law that requires the Board of Elections to be a run by 2 Democrats and 1 Republican while a Democrat is Governor?... and is the "Elections Chief" not controlled by this political majority? We all know bias' play into day to day decisions, its human nature. NC law requiring a particular party own a majority of Board of Election positions and each election site be run by a majority of Democrats does nothing but add to the speculation of conspiracy.
Non-Partisan?
Not implying a conspiracy, but a women known to have consistently referred to the Tea Party as "Crazy People" and republican observers as "morons" saying she operates on a non-partisan basis is a little hard to swallow. We all know the board of election workers are encouraged to change there affiliation to "unaffiliated" but the truth is the Board of Elections is partisan by its very definition. Correct me if I am wrong but is there not a state law that requires the Board of Elections to be a run by 2 Democrats and 1 Republican while a Democrat is Governor?... and is the "Elections Chief" not controlled by this political majority? We all know bias' play into day to day decisions, its human nature. NC law requiring a particular party own a majority of Board of Election positions and each election site be run by a majority of Democrats does nothing but add to the speculation of conspiracy.