A previous commenter is having a hard time with reading comprehension. The article clearly states the county commission voted to spend $333,334 on the turf. County commission does not vote for what the school system spends, or what the city council spends - therefore, the $333,334 is their share; which, again stated in the article, is a third of the cost. The city and the schools will each chip in that amount bringing the grand total of the turf $1,000,000.
Now is it such a worthy investment? When people are being taxed out of their homes? With no work? This is insane. This group of criminals never knows when to quit spending OUR money. But we are the ones to blame. You can't fault a cockroach for being a filthy creature; you have to fault the voters who keep electing these scum-sucking schmucks.
More information about formatting options