Submitted by Guestatwway (not verified) on Wed, 01/19/2011 - 2:27pm.
I am rarely a fan of Jason Thompson, but I have to agree with him here on some level. If it is not cost effective to impound a vehicle, then that's one thing, but why do the hard working citizens that follow the rules have to pay extra for "uninsured motorists" coverage since we have so many people driving vehicle that are not insured? I am surprised to see comments here from people that think it's perfectly fine for a person to operate an uninsured motor vehicle.
Hi
I am rarely a fan of Jason Thompson, but I have to agree with him here on some level. If it is not cost effective to impound a vehicle, then that's one thing, but why do the hard working citizens that follow the rules have to pay extra for "uninsured motorists" coverage since we have so many people driving vehicle that are not insured? I am surprised to see comments here from people that think it's perfectly fine for a person to operate an uninsured motor vehicle.