Submitted by Mike (not verified) on Tue, 04/05/2011 - 1:46pm.
Guest461,
I pretty much agree with everything you wrote, but I would posit that state governments (particularly California's) are more likely to benefit from ethanol additives than the so-called "fat cats" on Wall Street. For one thing, state governments can legally mandate -- under the guise of pollution control -- which additives must be put into gasoline. Their benefit comes in the form of additional tax revenue, of course.
Guest461, I pretty much
Guest461,
I pretty much agree with everything you wrote, but I would posit that state governments (particularly California's) are more likely to benefit from ethanol additives than the so-called "fat cats" on Wall Street. For one thing, state governments can legally mandate -- under the guise of pollution control -- which additives must be put into gasoline. Their benefit comes in the form of additional tax revenue, of course.
Mike
San Diego, CA