make WWAY your homepage  Become a fan on facebook  Follow us on twitter  Receive RSS Newsfeeds  MEMBERS: Register | Login

My 2 cents

I was going to refrain from comment but this is just too easy. First, as you all have been informed, the correct charge is crime against nature; not rape. For it to be "rape' your victim has be female, your assailant has to be male. Bottom line. There is another element specific to rape but I don't think it would make it past the editors. But, I think you can figure it out.

Another good point was raised. Was the "victim" charged with crime against nature for his willingness to participate in sex acts with another man in the bathroom? He broke the law and admitted it. I dont care what happened in the alley later, he broke the law in the bathroom. He should be charged. If the assailant is ever arrested, if he is charged with the crimes in the bathroom, his partner better be also.

Now, someone said God made people gay and they were born that way. How can I put this politely? Horse Hockey! All men are created equal and endowed by their creator. Men and women were created with certain sexual organs to be fruitful and multiply. If you are a homosexual, that is your choice. I dont care either way. I dont agree with it and I choose not be a part of it. You were not born that way. You saw a lifestyle and CHOSE to become part of it. Deal with it and stop blaming everyone else for your choices and mistakes.


The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.
Please re-enter the code shown in the image below.