Submitted by PF (not verified) on Wed, 06/29/2011 - 1:57am.
MikeG,
the outrage here is not over her being brought in to be tested, but for everything else. He was right to bring her in for breathalizer if she refused a field test. But, the issue here is the unprofessional and actionable behavior of the Trooper during and after the whole process - AND, the possible corruption in trying to set up the false arrest of the husband by another Trooper - AND, the behavior of the Magistrate..
I'm sorry that you can't see the fundamental lack of fairness here and how this tears at the fabric of the justice system which we all must have faith in as a civil society.
MikeG, you're missing the point
MikeG,
the outrage here is not over her being brought in to be tested, but for everything else. He was right to bring her in for breathalizer if she refused a field test. But, the issue here is the unprofessional and actionable behavior of the Trooper during and after the whole process - AND, the possible corruption in trying to set up the false arrest of the husband by another Trooper - AND, the behavior of the Magistrate..
I'm sorry that you can't see the fundamental lack of fairness here and how this tears at the fabric of the justice system which we all must have faith in as a civil society.