What you have is a citizen who happens to be a legal expert knowing what the trooper allegedly did was beyond the law. It will be interesting to hear more details, but so far it looks, smells and walks like a trooper with some issues, personal or professional, that led him to pick on the one person who had NOTHING he could hang a charge on and wasn't very happy about it (see 2nd trooper's actions, he let it drop). Defending one party because of their job and condemning another party because of THEIR profession is just childish...kind of like the trooper.