Submitted by Sharon Darity (not verified) on Thu, 06/30/2011 - 1:12pm.
I apologize for that mistake. I only checked out the news outlets that I normally use. WECT did not run with this story! That says alot to me. It sounds to me like they (WECT) checked the story out. If this trooper is innocent, and I believe he is, do you think that he will be able to effectively perform his job in this area again? The answer to that is a resounding 'NO'.
I don't dispute that this is news, of course it is. WWAY only provided a biased account of the events. This should not have been reported on until all of the facts were available. His record should speak for itself. He has an exemplary record. Why was that not brought up to begin with?
Scott Pickey
I apologize for that mistake. I only checked out the news outlets that I normally use. WECT did not run with this story! That says alot to me. It sounds to me like they (WECT) checked the story out. If this trooper is innocent, and I believe he is, do you think that he will be able to effectively perform his job in this area again? The answer to that is a resounding 'NO'.
I don't dispute that this is news, of course it is. WWAY only provided a biased account of the events. This should not have been reported on until all of the facts were available. His record should speak for itself. He has an exemplary record. Why was that not brought up to begin with?