...that's a democratic party written paper that holds about as much air as a fishnet stocking. Anyone can read the slant on all of the bullet items. You say you are a Republican, but you promote the democrats propoganda to smear Pantano? You say you are a "multiple combat veteran", but your recommendation "urging evereyone" to read an obviously slanted, left-party paper that writes these things about one of your own that has been in combat? This leaves you with little credence, if any at all. It also assists you with trying to make a murderer out of one of your own when you haven't even begun to study the actual "facts". You lose even more credence. A true combat soldier would never second guess and defame another, unless he saw it with his/her own eyes.
The problem we here is that you don't even know who YOU are. So, what is it that qualifies you to be "sickened" over another soldiers "poor judgement"?
More information about formatting options