Submitted by Tea Bagger (not verified) on Wed, 09/07/2011 - 5:33pm.
C-Man, you are kidding, right? Tea Partiers want to cut back on spending and that makes no sense to you? It is hard to insult the intelligence of someone who displays none.
You insist on taking more taxes from top 2% money earners (note that YOU said "earners"). What would be the amount you see is fair to take from them? 50%? 75%?? Even if you take 100% of their money, we would still be spending more than we take in. Not sure why you don't see the hard mathmatical facts... we can't sustain this level of Gov't spending much longer before we have gone beyond the point of no return.
But none of that matters to the Liberal. Just as long as our Gov't keeps handing out freebies.... life is good.
C-Man, you are kidding,
C-Man, you are kidding, right? Tea Partiers want to cut back on spending and that makes no sense to you? It is hard to insult the intelligence of someone who displays none.
You insist on taking more taxes from top 2% money earners (note that YOU said "earners"). What would be the amount you see is fair to take from them? 50%? 75%?? Even if you take 100% of their money, we would still be spending more than we take in. Not sure why you don't see the hard mathmatical facts... we can't sustain this level of Gov't spending much longer before we have gone beyond the point of no return.
But none of that matters to the Liberal. Just as long as our Gov't keeps handing out freebies.... life is good.