make WWAY your homepage  Become a fan on facebook  Follow us on twitter  Receive RSS Newsfeeds  MEMBERS: Register | Login

eyes have seen

No, what they are saying is that it was a wrongful discharge. They made up an excuse to get rid of her for retaliation. She stepped on the wrong person's toes. Bye the way this is against the Federal Law.

Are you sure she lied? Are you sure it was in her file? If it was then they knew from the beginning but I looked at the town's application and I don't see anything that asks if someone was ever terminated or asked to resign on it so exactly where did she lie? There is something that asks " Have you ever been convicted of an offense against the law or forfeited a bond? (A record or conviction will not necessarily exclude you from employment. Factors such as age at the time of offense, seriousness of offense and rehabilitation efforts will be considered)" This couldn't be the section because that would have been found out in the background check and even then they still could have hired her based on the clause provided.Speaking of background check, why wasn't any information discovered then.

Crazy is that you are a Farris loyalist. Want to know how I know-it's in the way you write. I bet you are one of those no nothings he promoted.

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.
CAPTCHA
Please re-enter the code shown in the image below.