Submitted by Guest1234 (not verified) on Fri, 12/02/2011 - 2:22pm.
So its unconstitutional if only property owners being annexed are able prevent involuntary annexation but completley constitutional for no one being annexed to prevent forced annexation?
My thoughts exactly
So its unconstitutional if only property owners being annexed are able prevent involuntary annexation but completley constitutional for no one being annexed to prevent forced annexation?
that is asinine logical councilman