Submitted by Guest461 (not verified) on Mon, 12/19/2011 - 3:16pm.
No problem with anyone being against misconduct by law enforcement. Nobody likes a bad cop, or a bad preacher, or a bad teacher, or a bad day-care attendant. My comment was simply indicative of the people that tend to group ALL law enforcement into the category of "perverts" and being "on the take by police unions" because of the actions of one. THAT my rambling friend, indicates hatred and disgust for all law enforcement which dribbles back to their own "bad" experiences with law enforcement. Bad experiences are highly relative to their criminal records. Criminals don't like the law OR the people that are put to task to enforce it. It's a simple and basic concept, put some study in it.
So tell us all Einstein. Just who are YOU to question MY allowance to vote when you ramble on with useless expenditure data that means absolutely ZILCHO to this subject?
Inherent stupidity?
No problem with anyone being against misconduct by law enforcement. Nobody likes a bad cop, or a bad preacher, or a bad teacher, or a bad day-care attendant. My comment was simply indicative of the people that tend to group ALL law enforcement into the category of "perverts" and being "on the take by police unions" because of the actions of one. THAT my rambling friend, indicates hatred and disgust for all law enforcement which dribbles back to their own "bad" experiences with law enforcement. Bad experiences are highly relative to their criminal records. Criminals don't like the law OR the people that are put to task to enforce it. It's a simple and basic concept, put some study in it.
So tell us all Einstein. Just who are YOU to question MY allowance to vote when you ramble on with useless expenditure data that means absolutely ZILCHO to this subject?
You can have the nasty cigar, I don't smoke...