Submitted by Oriana (not verified) on Fri, 03/16/2012 - 12:36pm.
"everyone involved was wrong; Right?
Had there been the slightest shred of innocence, a good attorney could have created the premise of "reasonable doubt" and he would have walked free."
Surf city Tom, were you in the courtroom? Because I sure was! I sat on the jury (lucky #13) and listened to 3 weeks of NO EVIDENCE other than circumstantial, one persons good word against another's.
This Case
"everyone involved was wrong; Right?
Had there been the slightest shred of innocence, a good attorney could have created the premise of "reasonable doubt" and he would have walked free."
Surf city Tom, were you in the courtroom? Because I sure was! I sat on the jury (lucky #13) and listened to 3 weeks of NO EVIDENCE other than circumstantial, one persons good word against another's.