Submitted by Opus the Poet (not verified) on Fri, 03/23/2012 - 12:58am.
The evidence is compelling, the driver hit 2 cyclists from the back while under the influence of 2 legal (at the time) drugs, but on at least one of them was over the limit of consuming it making him guilty of DUI and Intoxication Manslaughter at the least. Now if the jury finds him Not Guilty that means that cyclists are less then human and there is now an open season on killing them in NC.
There should be very little doubt about the outcome of the trial
The evidence is compelling, the driver hit 2 cyclists from the back while under the influence of 2 legal (at the time) drugs, but on at least one of them was over the limit of consuming it making him guilty of DUI and Intoxication Manslaughter at the least. Now if the jury finds him Not Guilty that means that cyclists are less then human and there is now an open season on killing them in NC.