Submitted by padlock (not verified) on Thu, 05/10/2012 - 11:07am.
I can't help but think the main problem here is not gays being together forever, but rather the wording of it. I am thinking that maybe if they can up with their own word for their own type of "marriage", then maybe it would be accepted better. For example, when a man and woman wish to be together forever, they call it a marriage. When gays want to be together forever, maybe they could come up with a different name for it and a different type of ceremony.
Maybe an original word that has never been heard of before, such as a
duoqual or unitionship, or maybe something like a "legal civil union", or something of the sort.I mean, it's start, it's an idea, what do you think?
gay marriage
I can't help but think the main problem here is not gays being together forever, but rather the wording of it. I am thinking that maybe if they can up with their own word for their own type of "marriage", then maybe it would be accepted better. For example, when a man and woman wish to be together forever, they call it a marriage. When gays want to be together forever, maybe they could come up with a different name for it and a different type of ceremony.
Maybe an original word that has never been heard of before, such as a
duoqual or unitionship, or maybe something like a "legal civil union", or something of the sort.I mean, it's start, it's an idea, what do you think?