Submitted by M291 (not verified) on Thu, 06/07/2012 - 9:15pm.
I'm assuming you are invoking the Equal Protection Clause, in that they are spending money on some but not others. There are a number of cases which say that the government can spend money as they see fit, as long as the class of people being advanced, hindered, are not a protected class (in thoses cases there must be a state interest: rational basis, compelling interest, etc). Non-downtown people are not a protected class. Honestly, if they had to be "equal," it's impossible, they could never do it, and our government would cease to function.
I think Downtown is a huge economic benefit for the city/county, and it could be a lot nicer if more people live, worked, and invested downtown.
I'm assuming you are
I'm assuming you are invoking the Equal Protection Clause, in that they are spending money on some but not others. There are a number of cases which say that the government can spend money as they see fit, as long as the class of people being advanced, hindered, are not a protected class (in thoses cases there must be a state interest: rational basis, compelling interest, etc). Non-downtown people are not a protected class. Honestly, if they had to be "equal," it's impossible, they could never do it, and our government would cease to function.
I think Downtown is a huge economic benefit for the city/county, and it could be a lot nicer if more people live, worked, and invested downtown.