I agree to a point
This is a flash poll or one that is done quickly with a smaller sized group. That's the reason why they say there's a +/- 5.7% swing. The smaller the sample the bigger the swing could be.
so whats more "fair"?
A random calling sample (possibly all Republicans)
Or a poll that INVITES people to respond (NSS Survey) with over 39% being non city residents? By the way you DID note in the NSS report that they ADMIT to it not being scientific whereas Civitas said it is and here's the possible margin of error...
I'm NOT crazy about the Big Squawker FM, and I don't listen, but Civitas is polling organization with a larger degree of "professionalism" when it comes to polling.
I just wish the sample size was bigger
Jason
I agree to a point
This is a flash poll or one that is done quickly with a smaller sized group. That's the reason why they say there's a +/- 5.7% swing. The smaller the sample the bigger the swing could be.
so whats more "fair"?
A random calling sample (possibly all Republicans)
Or a poll that INVITES people to respond (NSS Survey) with over 39% being non city residents? By the way you DID note in the NSS report that they ADMIT to it not being scientific whereas Civitas said it is and here's the possible margin of error...
I'm NOT crazy about the Big Squawker FM, and I don't listen, but Civitas is polling organization with a larger degree of "professionalism" when it comes to polling.
I just wish the sample size was bigger
Vog