how about answering my questions?
Do you and the other proponents of the ballpark have a vested interest in seeing this go through? Simple yes or no will do.
Initially you tried to come across as a baseball fan, pure and simple, and that was your reason for pushing so hard.
What marketing school school did you and your cronies attend? Every time an opponent presents pure and simple facts, you poke them in the eye with a sharp stick.
I've said it from the very beginning, every time you and your proponents post another fairy tale laden picture full of half truths, you make it more certain the opponents will look at everything you and your cronies post with a jaundiced eye at best.
One last question, where did you come up with projected attendance of 300,000 for the first year? The "sanctioned" study had 250,000 at best with the attendance dropping each year after.
If you're going to post something and make what you represent is a statement of fact and power, why not check your prior posted statements to be certain you aren't talking out of both sides of your mouth?
Just remember, a severely underfunded, under dog named Harry Truman did in fact beat an over funded, heavily favored Thomas Dewey for the 1948 Presidential election.
Wonder if history will repeat itself?
More information about formatting options