Submitted by Intheknow1 (not verified) on Mon, 08/27/2012 - 2:04am.
For someone who "testified" for Julia you sure don't seem to know what you're talking about. The court did not uphold "parental rights" for Julia. The court overturned the adoption. What they did was give her visitation rights, which she clearly should not have. Maybe Lala's ex-husband is concerned about his children. I would be.
parental rights?
For someone who "testified" for Julia you sure don't seem to know what you're talking about. The court did not uphold "parental rights" for Julia. The court overturned the adoption. What they did was give her visitation rights, which she clearly should not have. Maybe Lala's ex-husband is concerned about his children. I would be.