I have a question. All these articles keep saying is that he strangled the dog. This girl says that he took the dog out, strangled it, and put it back in the cage. At what point was the girl there? While he allegedly choked it or upon finding it dead in it's cage and accusing him of killing it? I don't condone cruelty to animals but neither do I think he should be considered guilty without due process as the law allows. People read a headline and jump to conclusions...what happened to innocent until proven guilty? Maybe we should have a lynching. It's even more comical to see all of the references to his hair being an obvious sign pointing to his cruel and devious character. Get real and let the facts speak for themselves.
More information about formatting options