Of the 5 properties NSS evaluated only one that was down town. The vast majority were not on the river at all.
Every team, every owner, and the league wants down town?
Please cite your sources.
You have fallen for the all or nothing aspect of this deal.
You have put forth an attitude that this deal, for this location, is the ONLY viable deal out there. Yet NSS looked at 5 other properties none of which were on the river. They "claim" that this would have the biggest economic impact. I disagree and have cited studies as to why.
I don't disagree with having baseball here in general. I fully expect MiLB to be here some time in the next 4 to 5 years.
But there will be no taxpayer dollars involved.
80% of the locations NSS looked at were not on the river.
What is it with this 80% number ? 80% oppose taxpayer funding - 80% of the sites were not on the river.
What is your hang up with 80%?
More information about formatting options