Submitted by mario (not verified) on Wed, 08/29/2012 - 6:10am.
If the city has a 'non taxpayer' option, don't you think they'd explore it. My question is, "Who's going to pay?"
I think we're jumping the gun here. If a firm offer was submitted to the county that would give us the ability to compare the two offers, then great.
This is just like striking at the wind.
We don't even know if this other entity is truly interested. At least I know that Mandalay is. Ripkin could say..oh here's a possibility, and then back out...perfect example...the many companies who promised to build the convention center hotel.
Jumping the gun...
If the city has a 'non taxpayer' option, don't you think they'd explore it. My question is, "Who's going to pay?"
I think we're jumping the gun here. If a firm offer was submitted to the county that would give us the ability to compare the two offers, then great.
This is just like striking at the wind.
We don't even know if this other entity is truly interested. At least I know that Mandalay is. Ripkin could say..oh here's a possibility, and then back out...perfect example...the many companies who promised to build the convention center hotel.