Submitted by SurfCityTom on Tue, 09/25/2012 - 8:19am.
those pro ballparkers, who are lusting for a city financed ballpark never read the opposing position in its entirety. Better to just make a few witless statements which have no relevance.
Anyone with half a brain should be questioning the toxic state of the grounds they propose to build on.
Early on I did; and of course the witless duo had comments to make concerning no need to worry.
Yet, that appears to be raising its head again as even Ms. Padgett has questioned it within the past week or so.
If they want to be really honest, that should be disclosed and soon.
Does T really think he can get back into the banking industry if he can get this property sold?
Really not funny
those pro ballparkers, who are lusting for a city financed ballpark never read the opposing position in its entirety. Better to just make a few witless statements which have no relevance.
Anyone with half a brain should be questioning the toxic state of the grounds they propose to build on.
Early on I did; and of course the witless duo had comments to make concerning no need to worry.
Yet, that appears to be raising its head again as even Ms. Padgett has questioned it within the past week or so.
If they want to be really honest, that should be disclosed and soon.
Does T really think he can get back into the banking industry if he can get this property sold?