Submitted by Guestcleanup (not verified) on Wed, 09/26/2012 - 11:53am.
Why is the city not requiring the owner of the property to clean it up? This should have been done once it was found that it was a Brownfield. Why should the tax payers have to pay to clean it up. Let the owner do it then put it on the market or let the city condemn property it and take it.
We should never pay for something that has problems and then expect the tax payers to repair it..
Owner of property
Why is the city not requiring the owner of the property to clean it up? This should have been done once it was found that it was a Brownfield. Why should the tax payers have to pay to clean it up. Let the owner do it then put it on the market or let the city condemn property it and take it.
We should never pay for something that has problems and then expect the tax payers to repair it..