Submitted by Guest User (not verified) on Fri, 09/28/2012 - 12:35pm.
I am wondering why WWAY3 revealed Mr. White's name and not the lady who accused him. It is fairly easy to file a warrant for sexual harassment even without proof. Of course, proving sexual harassment in court is the real test. "Rachel" better have some real proof or she may be exposing herself to a lawsuit. Did WWAY3 check "Rachel's" background or just assume she is telling the truth? I don't know of any politician who is "clean as a whistle", but Mr. White has always acted like a gentleman around everyone, male and female. I wouldn't be surprised if there is some other motive in these accusations. In the meantime, I expect that Mr. White will be assumed guilty until proven innocent.
WWAY3 Policy On Publication of Names
I am wondering why WWAY3 revealed Mr. White's name and not the lady who accused him. It is fairly easy to file a warrant for sexual harassment even without proof. Of course, proving sexual harassment in court is the real test. "Rachel" better have some real proof or she may be exposing herself to a lawsuit. Did WWAY3 check "Rachel's" background or just assume she is telling the truth? I don't know of any politician who is "clean as a whistle", but Mr. White has always acted like a gentleman around everyone, male and female. I wouldn't be surprised if there is some other motive in these accusations. In the meantime, I expect that Mr. White will be assumed guilty until proven innocent.