Submitted by Guest keegan (not verified) on Sun, 10/07/2012 - 6:59pm.
The lady you just said all that stuff about is not the one in the picture being charged with sexual "disorder" now and in the year 2000. There is no reason for her to defend herself of anything you say. She isn't the one being charged here. You must get your information from White or his puppet! Y'all are just trying to take the focus off the real guilty parties and honey, that ain't gonna happen! No siree, Bob! It ain't gonna happen! Her tags might be from TN. but she ain't no sex offender!!!!!! No siree Bob!!!!!!!
Bob and Carol
The lady you just said all that stuff about is not the one in the picture being charged with sexual "disorder" now and in the year 2000. There is no reason for her to defend herself of anything you say. She isn't the one being charged here. You must get your information from White or his puppet! Y'all are just trying to take the focus off the real guilty parties and honey, that ain't gonna happen! No siree, Bob! It ain't gonna happen! Her tags might be from TN. but she ain't no sex offender!!!!!! No siree Bob!!!!!!!