Submitted by Guest85 (not verified) on Thu, 10/18/2012 - 10:53pm.
I am sorry. My reply left a lot to be desired. I felt assaulted since my word was not taken as reality. My doctor's office does not accept walk-ins or work-ins. Period.
So the thread has gotten too far off-track. I just want to get it back on track by stating that I am in no way excusing the absence and thought I stated that. There is no excuse for it. I remain firm in my embarrassment of my vote. As it has been made clear through this website, there is little to nothing that legally can be done to remove this man from office. I was offering an excuse for someone who may not have access to a doctor, and I repeat, if you have ready access, be very thankful; many are not as blessed. Berger A) should not have missed a meeting for a stomach ache unless it required hospitalization, and B) at minimum should have notified someone.
I do NOT support the man in any way. I do not know the man. I voted foolishly. I do, however, think WWAY in their reporting on him in general could be interpreted as stalking.
Apology
I am sorry. My reply left a lot to be desired. I felt assaulted since my word was not taken as reality. My doctor's office does not accept walk-ins or work-ins. Period.
So the thread has gotten too far off-track. I just want to get it back on track by stating that I am in no way excusing the absence and thought I stated that. There is no excuse for it. I remain firm in my embarrassment of my vote. As it has been made clear through this website, there is little to nothing that legally can be done to remove this man from office. I was offering an excuse for someone who may not have access to a doctor, and I repeat, if you have ready access, be very thankful; many are not as blessed. Berger A) should not have missed a meeting for a stomach ache unless it required hospitalization, and B) at minimum should have notified someone.
I do NOT support the man in any way. I do not know the man. I voted foolishly. I do, however, think WWAY in their reporting on him in general could be interpreted as stalking.
Again,
My apologies