If this were a regular "Joe", there would not be any qualms about a retrial.

And certainly there would not be a problem with "resources".

This is an example of people with financial resources getting a break, while others that are poor get walked on.

This case will demonstrate whether someone "connected" will dodge a charge, or will he truly be held accountable for his alleged misdeed.

Everyone is tired of "public officials" getting preferential treatment.