....having the land available, because remember that if this doesn't go to the ballpark, it will go to something else, but we don't know what," City Councilman Kevin O'Grady said.
Well at least O'Grady will concede the fact private development will occur on the site. Which will be better: A stadium that is a tax liability or private development that will contribute to the tax base? I know what my vote would be.
That site pays property taxes now but once the city owns it, that is lost revenue.
More information about formatting options