Submitted by Guest 1492 (not verified) on Tue, 11/06/2012 - 3:06pm.
she would have perjured herself.
If she was being truthful, she would have sworn under oath that she was being truthful about her residency and then, in order to avoid a drawn out process, would have simply withdrawn her candidacy for the position. She did not do that.
Regardless of your perspective on Mr LaNasa's political worthiness, it is beyond cheesy to personally attack him for the purpose of distracting others from focusing on Ms. Gott's misdeeds. This issue is about Ms. Gott, not Mr. LaNasa.
People like you are why more and more voters are deciding to be unaffiliated rather than vote straight tickets. Far too many mindless soldier ants in both parties are willing to do or say anything in order to win.
Gott wouldn't swear under oath because
she would have perjured herself.
If she was being truthful, she would have sworn under oath that she was being truthful about her residency and then, in order to avoid a drawn out process, would have simply withdrawn her candidacy for the position. She did not do that.
Regardless of your perspective on Mr LaNasa's political worthiness, it is beyond cheesy to personally attack him for the purpose of distracting others from focusing on Ms. Gott's misdeeds. This issue is about Ms. Gott, not Mr. LaNasa.
People like you are why more and more voters are deciding to be unaffiliated rather than vote straight tickets. Far too many mindless soldier ants in both parties are willing to do or say anything in order to win.