Submitted by windsnake6969 (not verified) on Thu, 11/08/2012 - 2:08pm.
Why would Brinks originally say that all the money was accounted for, but now interestingly $41,000 is suddenly missing? That's a rather large amount to accidentally 'overlook.' I hope this gets investigated as it sounds like fraud to me!
Something smells fishy
Why would Brinks originally say that all the money was accounted for, but now interestingly $41,000 is suddenly missing? That's a rather large amount to accidentally 'overlook.' I hope this gets investigated as it sounds like fraud to me!